If the mandate is not fulfilled now, we will go to other elections. The caretaker government enjoys great confidence in sociology, but does not enjoy it in plenary. This was said by Aleksandar Sidi from IMRO.
He said that the Bulgarian people had chosen to be represented by a person who was sitting at home on the sofa and was not responsible. People wanted change, but it happened that they voted for Slavi Trifonov and got Toshko Yordanov. Now they are being offered another person for Prime Minister, a person who sells beach goods. Quite a logical decision for the summer, said Sidi. According to him, it is very likely that in case of a problem with the cabinet in the winter they will appoint a Prime Minister dealing with ski equipment.
The politician from VMRO logically asked how Trifonov could be responsible after another person was nominated for prime minister, whose name is new and unknown in Bulgaria. It is he who will be the face of our country and will receive all the information from the services.
On the air of „BNT“ Aleksandar Sidi also asked:
„Who is this person who will go to tell Slavi Trifonov the classified information to which he does not have access?“
Bulgaria needs a regular government, that’s for sure, Sidi added. However, his assumptions are that the fate of „There is such a people“ will be like that of Oresharski’s cabinet – they will be expelled in exactly the same way. The reason – „the support that can be seen is the support of „There is such a people“, BSP and MRF, of course, always in the corner.„, said the representative of IMRO.
According to him, the approach in ordering the ministers in the draft cabinet is a symbol of „aggressive policy-making“. Maybe it’s not even a question of politics, but of a statement – this and that will happen.
Aleksandar Sidi described yesterday as a day of contrasts. On the one hand, he stressed, was the success of Ivet Goranova, who made all Bulgaria proud, on the other – Filip Stanev, who entered the National Assembly wearing jeans.
The patriot is of the opinion that these differences demonstrate the two faces of our country. It’s not acceptable to go to the „most important platform“ in a republic like that, it portrays your whole attitude to statehood.
