Who benefits from the attack on the National Theatre? This question was raised by analyst Stefan Gamizov in a comment on the social media platform Facebook regarding last night’s disturbances. According to him, the only one who benefits from the unrest is Delyan Peevski. He was trembling because those who imposed sanctions on him under the Magnitsky Act were returning to power in the US. And more:
„Who benefits from the attack on the National Theatre?
Peevski and no one else.
Peevski is trembling now because in the US those who put him under sanctions are back in power and those who made us doubt the morality of the US are leaving, watching how Peevski is „getting away with it“.
The director of the National Theatre is a Peevski appointee, as is his personal PR specialist. There was no such defensive hysteria in the media when these people forced Sasha Morfov out of the theatre.
„Nationalists“ acting on command, attacked yesterday this Peevski-backed liberal-corruption theatrical troupe (not Malcovich but Peevski’s theatre, also known as the National Theatre), while it was assisting a „bad“ American, who is well-known enough to make news worldwide with this story.
„Nationalists“ attacked a mediocre actor in front of the building (the director), who in a community soap opera was caught on screen with a torn shirt in a poorly acted scene featuring rehearsed lines, „For God’s sake, watch the play first.“
The message is clear – „Delyan Peevski and John Malkovich are civilizing us, and “nationalists”’ attacked them.“
All of this is a good example of how our state is incapable of dealing with pro-Russian hybrid terrorism, because that is exactly what it is.
Hybrid terrorism that is practiced by a terrorist group that has taken over the entire country and even the National Theatre.
By the way, I would like to know if there has been any undeclared payment from Peevski to John Malkovich to work in Sofia?
It is certainly true that John Malkovich, who is publicly known to have lost his money in Madoff’s pyramid scheme, is not part of any conspiracy and is simply doing theatre. However, that doesn’t mean he can’t be exploited by Peevski.
If some people are good at being „directors“ of hybrid soap operas, others of us are excellent theatrical „critics“ of the work of Russian intelligence services and organized oligarchic crime.“
[…] Who benefits from the attack on the National Theatre? […]